Robert Fisk, writing in the Independent today insists: Western agreement 'could leave Syria in Assad's hands for two more years' because, surprise, surprise, "Need for oil routes buys time, claims key Damascus figure"
Here are three paragraphs from Fisk's article that explain why Qatar and Saudi Arabia are cooperating with Western interests in seeking regime change in Syria. This is no Arab Spring.
Here are three paragraphs from Fisk's article that explain why Qatar and Saudi Arabia are cooperating with Western interests in seeking regime change in Syria. This is no Arab Spring.
"But the real object of talks between the world powers revolves around the West’s determination to secure oil and particularly gas from the Gulf states without relying upon supplies from Moscow. “Russia can turn off the spigot to Europe whenever it wants – and this gives it tremendous political power,” the source says. “We are talking about two fundamental oil routes to the West – one from Qatar and Saudi Arabia via Jordan and Syria and the Mediterranean to Europe, another from Iran via Shia southern Iraq and Syria to the Mediterranean and on to Europe. This is what matters."Read more here.
"It is one thing to hear political leaders excoriating the Syrian regime for its abuse of human rights and massacres – quite another to realise that Western diplomats are quite prepared to put this to one side for the proverbial ‘bigger picture’ which, as usual in the Middle East, means oil and gas supplies."
"And, much more interesting to Assad’s men, the West continued to support the Algerian regime with weapons and political encouragement throughout the 1990s while huffing and puffing about human rights. Algeria’s oil and gas reserves proved more important than civilian deaths – just as the Damascus regime now hopes to rely upon the West’s desire for via-Syria oil and gas to tolerate further killings"





























